In the 70 WUAs assigned to the COODU, the organisation organised capacity building and training Programmes at 2 WUAs per programme. The WUA members were equipped with skills and knowledge on the following topics and issues.
Conflicts on community assets have been amicably resolved by sub-committees. COODU has fulfilled tasks assigned to it in accordance with the ToR, leading to achievement of all the Project Objectives. It is heartening that, the WUAs have executed various works in the water sources on their own, with labour and financial contributions from its members and continue to do the same in a sustainable manner. All the water resources would henceforth be treated as community assets. Development of durable and sustainable assets is assured. But for the failure of monsoon, the outcomes and outputs would have brought tangible benefits to the WUAs members and growth in agriculture and allied sectors.
Case Study-1:
i. Name of Farmer : V.Radhakrishnan
ii. WUA : Vadakarai Periakulam and chinnakulam.
iii. Type of Irrigation : Non system tanks
iv. Sub Basin : Therkar
v. District / Taluk : Madurai / Usilampatti
vi. WUA area : 193.68 Ha.
vii. Rainfall : Not normal. Low rainfall for the past 3 years. Not
even sufficient for one month storage
viii. People’s initiative : The Government carries out desilting of canal from
Thirumangalam Gundar to vadakarai tank once in five
years. Hence in order to get water to the tank, the
WUA takes up desilting of the canal every year at a
cost of Rs1.75 lakhs to Rs2.0 lakhs, wholly contributed
by its members by subscription. The length of the
canal is 3 km. There are four sluices and two surplus
weirs.
ix. Other irrigation source : Sewage flows in from Thirumangalam town,
enough to irrigate one acre of agriculture land every
day. The WUA regulates its distribution
and has arranged to irrigate land on rotation basis.
At present, cotton fields are irrigated by using a motor
at the expense of the WUA.
x. Proposed Work : The Government have sanctioned desilting of canal
from Sathankudi tank located a km from
Tirumangalam to Vadakarai tank at a cost of Rs.30
Crores. The PWD will float tenders for the work.
xi. Existing Assets : i). Vadakarai big and small tanks linked by a canal.
ii). Gundar vadakarai canal.
xii. Issues : The farmer has planted cotton in 10 acres of his land.
He says that neither the cotton seed nor the
insecticide supplied by the agriculture department
are of good quality or effective or worthwhile. He
could get good quality cotten seeds from private
companies.
The TNAU Personnel do not come to the village for
study or advice. Pests attack cotton plants just before
picking. There is no effective pest control.
xiii. Suggestions : Line departments should be periodically in touch with
the WUAs. TNAU should conduct study on pests
attacking cotton plants and advice on pest control.
Agriculture department to supply quality cotton seeds
and send its field officials to visit cotton and other
fields periodically.
Case Study-2:
i. Name of Farmer : N.Radhakrishnan
ii. WUA : Manjalnadhi Tank, Naickankulam,
Thathamuthankulam, Kanavaimudakkukulam &
Karuvelankulam Tanks.
iii. Type of Irrigation : Non system
iv. Sub Basin : Upper Vaigai, Varattar-Nagalar
v. Name of cluster : Andipatti
vi. Membership : WUA-Technical Committee and National
Agriculture Mission – Banana committee.
vii. Personal Ahievements: Raised banana plantation in 50 acres during the
year 2010-2011, has raised banana plantation in 20
acres in 2013-14 drawing water from bore well due to
failure of monsoon.
viii. Statement on the Project: Naickankulam tank encompasses 100 acres of land
with 100 acres ayacut area and 1300 Ha catchment
area.
• Agricultural Engineering department has desilted
channel – Drip irrigation lines laid for 5 Km.
• Desilting and strengthening of tank executed under
MGNREGS, thereby also providing employment
opportunities.
ix. Initiative of WUA : Carried out jungle clearance in the channel prior
to its desilting by Agricultural Engineering
Department.
x. Suggestions : Periodic Desilting of tank, pond and Oorani.
• Release of government subsidy to WUAs.
• Convergence of schemes including MGNREGS for the improvement of water
resources.
Case Study-3:
i. Name of Farmer : M.Pitchai, President – Thirali WUA.
ii. WUA : Thirali Tank WUA.
iii. Type of Irrigation : Non system.
iv. Sub Basin : Upper Gundar.
v. Name of cluster : Thirumangalam.
vi. WUA area : 142.600 Ha.
vii. Personal Achievements : Has strengthened the WUA, Initiated
Kudimaramathu in supply and feeder channels with
people contributing their labour as well as money
viii. Statements on project: Monsoon failure, Low Rainfall for the past three
years: Only one month storage during Monsoon
• In 2011-12, strengthening of bund taken up by PWD at
a cost of Rs.50.0 lakhs and Rs.48.0 lakhs for surplus
weir repairs built across the river.
• No well in the tank.
• 15 wells in the ayacut area.
• Owns 1 acre agri land with no well.
• Now all lands are rainfed
• Black soil on one side and black soil with gravel on
another side of the area.
• Depending on availability of ( ground) water,
sugarcane, groundnut, cotton and sun flower also
cultivated, besides paddy.
• Single crop in rainfed areas and two crops in land
irrigated by well.
• Tank area – 490 acre ; ayacut area – 500 acre.
• Work under MGNREGS also was undertaken in the
tank, two times during the 2013-14 for 4 months.
ix. Initiatives of the WUA: Executed desilting of supply channel from Gundar
at Nauvakottai with a length of 3 Km with contribution
of labour and money by members, labour
contribution- one from each family on the
pattern of “Kudimaramathu”.
• In the feeder channel from the tank, channel for a
length of 150 meter desilted.
x. Suggestions : Formation of a well in the tank
• Convergence of schemes including MGNREGS.
• WUA should be truly empowered as per Act.
• Better co-ordination among the 8 line departments of
WUA
• The 5 departments other than horticulture,
Agricultural Engg and PWD-WRO should also extend
their services in fulfilling the objectives of the project.